@esploratore1 you are correct - back in 2006, Schumacher caused a yellow flag to be brought out, which meant that drivers behind him had to slow down.

The case with Schumacher also highlights the point that others have made, which is that the rules already given the stewards the power to penalise a driver judged to have acted maliciously and already gives them the data to analyse that scenario.

Furthermore, let's be blunt - most complaints here about red flags are being deliberately selective by only cherry picking a situation where there was a perceived benefit to the driver who caused it, but omit the scenarios where it was to the disadvantage of the driver involved.

I would wager that, if you actually analysed the situation properly, you'd find that those sorts of accidents have more often been to the detriment of the driver involved - posters here attack Perez for Monaco 2022, but there have been far more instances in recent years where the driver who caused the red flag ended up significantly worse off than they would have been without crashing.

Just think about those in 2023 - we had Perez, Gasly, de Vries, Sargeant, Stroll, Piastri, Bottas and Ricciardo cause red flags due to crashing during qualifying. Out of those named, every single driver apart from Bottas ended up actively harming their chances with those accidents - and, in the case of Bottas, many here argued that the race director prematurely threw the red flag for an incident that could have been dealt with under yellow flags.

No, the intention of the rule may sound ok, with penalising drivers that willingly cause a red flag to salvage the qualifying position they've just managed, but there's a couple of things that make my hair go stand up straight:
- There's rules for that already.
- It does not prevent crashgate situations where a team mate does the job for you.
- They've shut down the appeal option
- The wording, as usual, is vague and leaves room for 'interpretation' and/or even manipulation that shouldn't be there.
- The stewards have a track record of taking controversial decisions, and the FiA generally allows for it, even after 'investigations'.
- There should be as little room as possible for 'closed doors decisions' based on opinions in this sport, so a rule stating 'in the opinion of' is quite the opposite.

Want me to go on for another hour or so?
- I think it makes drivers try less hard, and punishes those that do try.

Tell that reasoning to Trump.
And I assess the FiA or it's stewards no higher.

So your beef is not so much with the rule, but your mistrust of the stewards?

I also want to see them trying. Now there is an argument that somebody made that pointed out that Verstappen in Jeddah 2021 might never have happened, given the risk of losing his first lap time. If I remember right he was last on track and couldn't have ruined anyone's lap. That's a potential gotcha. But I would hazard a guess that he'd have still gone for it, given the situation of the championship at the time. It'd be different in 2022-2023 when there wasn't so much on the line perhaps.

The best drivers will still try it. And if they don't, they risk someone else going balls out trying it. It's not counterproductive. If anything it brings greater reward to those that have the metal to go for it.

I can't remember who or when it was but was there not at least 2-3 times the past year or 2 where a driver spun off with a red flag been called even though the driver was able to safely rejoin the track and carry on fairly quickly.

And we have also seen instances where a driver has gone off and a red flag has completely unecisarily been called because of a bit of gravel or dirt that ended up on track. And again they have been very inconsistent with that so again I don't think we can trust them to be fair or consistent with it.

I don't really see a need for additional over-regulation & more needless penalties given how the stewards already have the power to penalise drivers for intentionally impeding in qualifying by causing yellow/red flags & it is indeed something they have used in the past to exclude a driver from qualifying. So just use that rather than bringing in a ridiculous blanket penalty that is just going to be a penalty on-top of a penalty for making a mistake which is ridiculous.

What a joke this show that used to be a sport is becoming!!!

@SteveP But there is already something there which allows drivers who are found to have intentionally gone off in qualifying to be penalised by the stewards in the form of disqualification from qualifying.

Hence why Michael Schumacher had to start from the back of the grid in 2006. That option was there then & it's still there today as far as i'm aware.

Drivers who intentionally cause yellow or red flags in qualifying should indeed be penalised accordingly; Honest mistakes however should not be. Handing out penalties for an honest & potentially minor mistake while on the edge in qualifying is not & never will be fair or sporting.

Again if it's intentional then by all means hand out a harsh penalty but if it isn't then it isn't right to do so.

The stewards do actually penalise drivers who cause crashes, regularly, and without saying it was intentional.

Next time there's a crash (or even just a bump) in a race, watch the top of your screen: you'll probably see a message that the stewards are investigating it. About half the time, they decide one or other of the drivers mostly caused the crash (not intentionally, just by mistake), and they'll penalise them.

It's a completely normal part of the rules that you just might not have noticed before.

If the stewards thought someone was intentionally crashing - which as you correctly say, is normally the stuff of consipracy theorists - you're in ban territory. See: Schumacher, Briatore. The penalty would be much more severe than missing the rest of a 15-minute quali session.

I don’t know what’s not to like about this rule.

Two possibilities:
1) Yes you do, you just don't want to acknowledge that you do.
2) Try harder. It's not that difficult at all.

Read it more carefully.

“any driver who in the opinion of the stewards is the sole cause of the issuance of a red flag”

So that means if the failure is out of a driver’s control, it doesn’t apply.

You're dead wrong, rprp; read it more carefully:

“any driver who in the opinion of the stewards is the sole cause of the issuance of a red flag”

means that it is the stewards that get to decide whether it's out of a driver's control yes or no. There's absolutely nothing automatic about it applying or not, like you suggest.

Given the decisions by the stewards over the recent years, with no knowing, no certainty and zero consistency, that means drivers will have to stay well within the limits - their limits and the car's limits- , just to 'please' the stewards, because if they don't, there's no telling what might happen and what they decide.

I want to see them trying, and I mean really trying, because that's what sports is about.
Yes, that goes hand in hand with getting it wrong sometimes and having tried too hard. But I want to hear them say 'Well, at least I've tried'. When trying gets punished, that is downright wrong for a sports. If it can't be detected otherwise, then the qualifying format is wrong, not the drivers because they're trying, and this rule doesn't 'mend' it.

Counterproductive rule, like so many that have seen the light in recent years.

Wasn't schumacher 2006 also a yellow? I'm pretty sure alonso merely slowed down, it'd have been different if it were a red.

This is happening in the context of some odd events that may or may not have been intentional, but nevertheless appeared intentional to a conspiracy-minded part of the public. That's prompted these discussions, and apparently now these changes.

I don't see any other reason to introduce penalties. Deleting a time is a penalty, as is preventing people from taking part in a session (it's essentially a DSQ, one of the harshest possible penalties). But the stewards do not penalize people who crash out. That's never been a thing in all of F1 history. It's part of racing and we all want to see the drivers push to the limit; especially in qualifying. Sometimes they misjudge that. Sometimes other competitiros are then unable to complete their laps. It happens… and thankfully, only very rarely.

Penalize intentional shenanigans, sure. Penalize mistakes? What's next, race bans for people who "cause" a safety car? After all, safety cars routinely ruin people's races. Far more often than any qualifying mishaps.

Sounds like people aren't thinking through the consequences of doing nothing.

rprp Yes, they're supposed to be the so-called best drivers in the world, but my original point that no one's perfect still applies, which makes a scenario where no one ever makes mistakes while pushing on the limit to be as fast as possible is impossible & the whole point in motorsports is to be fast, so contradictory argument.

I absolutely hate these kinds of rules, Completely unnecessary and at times both unfair & nothing but an additional penalty on top of the penalty for making a mistake to begin with.

If a driver is pushing to/beyond the limit trying to better a lap time and make a genuine error that already costs them the opportunity to improve & potentially damages the car that is penalty enough so adding additional penalties is just ridiculous.

Look at Verstappen in Jeddah 2021 as an example. He had that car on the limit through that lap & it was brilliant to watch yet he made one small error in the final corner that took him out of contention for the pole. It gained him nothing & didn't really cost anyone else anything.

The penalty for not been able to improve his time & get the pole the lap to that point was looking like he was going to get was the penalty. Deleting his prior time and giving him the additional penalty of starting probably 10th would have been completely illogical and may have even discouraged that sort of on & at times over the limit that that qualifying should be about.

And what about Stroll at Singapore this year or Norris at Spa in 2021? Massive accidents that took them out of qualifying & destroyed the cars. That was the penalty for making the error so zero need to add an additional penalty on top of that.

If something is done intentionally & such a thing can be proven then by all means hand out a penalty. But doing it for every incident including for honest mistakes that even the best can make when pushing on the limit going for pole (Again pointing to that Max lap in Jeddah '21) is just one of the silliest ideas ever.

There's nothing in the rule as reported about causing the crash *on purpose*.

It's simply - driver X crashed while no-one else is around, causing a red flag. Therefore driver X (and possibly their car) is the sole cause of the crash. They cannot participate in the session after the restart, and they may have a time deleted.

Even if two drivers were to hit each other and the stewards ruled one was the "sole" cause, it wouldn't mean the collision was necessarily on purpose: simply that the fault all lay with one driver.

That said, "in the opinion of the stewards" does mean they are essentially saying the driver did this on purpose. That is unsporting behaviour, and could already be penalized (though the exact penalties for that weren't laid out). But more importantly, like with the addition of mentioning unsporting behaviour in the penalty given to Norris in Canada, these penalties quickly feel personal. And in the world of sports, where drivers seek to cash in on their own merchandise sales, such a label can quickly lead to reputational damage. And that could become quite a legal mess if pursued.

The way I interpret it, in eg 1, yes, the first driver would lose their bests lap time, and it would basically put them at the back of that session's classification

In eg 2, assuming the driver that crashes on their 2nd hot lap, they would lose their first hot lap. And again, back of the session's classification.

If the driver, for example, went faster on their 2nd hot lap, and crashed on their cool down lap (which would be odd and suspicious, unless a very sudden change in conditions occurred), they would lose their 2nd hot lap. And I suspect there would be an investigation into foul play for crashing on their cool down lap. F1 drivers really ought to be able to get a car around a track when not pushing at 100%.

Once again:

“any driver who in the opinion of the stewards is the sole cause of the issuance of a red flag”

There's no way the stewards could deem that to be solely caused by the driver (Sainz).

I don't know what's not to like about this rule.